Schiffman v. Peerless Motor Car Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Frederick W. Houser, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.
Action to recover damages for breach of contract. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals therefrom and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
Plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement on January 28, 1905, which recites that defendant is engaged in the manufacture of motor ears and parts which it desires to market to the best advantage, and that plaintiff proposes to engage in the sale of defendant’s product and agrees to purchase a certain number of its motor cars, to be resold within a certain ;fixed territory named (seven counties of Southern California). Plaintiff…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Sanford v. E. RiverSide Irrigation Dist.California Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by18 opinions
- Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Brandon & Tibbs v. George Kevorkian Accountancy Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Hacker Pipe & Supply Co. v. Chapman Valve Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- American Const. Co. v. CaswellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Isbell v. Anderson Carriage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.