Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Rice

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided October 5, 1988No. 17187PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

Roy and Jane Rice (Rice) appeal from a magistrate’s judgment holding them liable for breach of a contract to purchase insurance from Marsh & McLennan of Idaho, Inc. The respondent, Donald P. Christensen of Christensen & Associates (Christen sen), is assignee of that contract. On appeal, the district court affirmed the magistrate’s judgment. Appealing further, Rice raises three issues: (1) whether the trial court erred in deciding this case on a theory of “open account,” after allowing Christensen to present evidence supporting recovery under that theory, when the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Dinneen v. FinchIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Cantrill v. American Mail Line, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. M. K. Transport, Inc. v. GroverIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Rossomanno v. Laclede Cab CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cook v. Skyline Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. Sandoval-TenaIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State, Department of Health & Welfare Ex Rel. Osborn v. AltmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Youngblood v. HigbeeIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. MubitaIdaho Supreme Court · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API