Legal Opinion

State v. Sandoval-Tena

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2003No. 27935PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

Heriberto Sandoval-Tena appeals from his conviction of trafficking in methamphetamine. Sandoval-Tena contends that the district court committed reversible error when (1) it permitted a police crime lab report to come into evidence under the “business records exception” to the hearsay rule, and (2) when it informed the prosecutor that he had failed to elicit testimonial evidence from the lab investigator as to the weight of the substances tested and then permitted the prosecutor to recall that witness.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Acting on a tip from a confidential…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. Paul v. OatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. Sanchez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Danial Siebert v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. United States v. Richard Clinton AllsupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. FieldIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. SaucierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. State v. ChristiansenIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. WatkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. HuntsmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API