Legal Opinion

Cantrill v. American Mail Line, Ltd.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1953No. 32073PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

Plaintiff brought this action under the .Jones act to recover damages (including maintenance and ■cure) for personal injuries suffered while in the employ of defendant as a seaman. In its answer, defendant denied any negligence and affirmatively alleged that plaintiff’s injuries were the result of a freak wave unexpectedly striking its vessel, an event which could not reasonably have been anticipated and was a risk assumed by seamen in their hazardous calling. A second affirmative defense (relating to maintenance and cure) was that plaintiff was obligated to avail himself of free medical…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, Inc. Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. State v. MeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Owens v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Webb v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. State v. KreckWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Marisa Bavand v. Onewest Bank FsbCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. Dabroe v. Rhodes Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. ZieglerWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Young v. LiddingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1957

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API