Legal Opinion
Cantwell v. County of San Mateo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 31, 1980No. Nos. 78-1765, 78-1820PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
The principal issue in this appeal involves the resolution of an apparent conflict between federal statutes granting retirement pay to military reserve personnel and California statutes establishing retirement plans for county employees. The appellants, the County of San Mateo (“County”) and the Retirement Board of San Mateo County (“Board”), challenge the district court’s decision determining that the federal statutes were controlling. The County also contends that the district court erred in determining the date as of which the appel-lee, Sidney H. Cantwell, Jr., was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Case v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Trailer Train Company, a Corporation and Railbox Company, a Corporation v. State Board of EqualizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Thomas B. Sawyer v. County of Sonoma and Retirement Board of the County of Sonoma, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Gene Southerland v. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union, Local 8, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- In Re HoloholoDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.