Legal Opinion
Thomas B. Sawyer v. County of Sonoma and Retirement Board of the County of Sonoma, Defendants
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 1, 1983No. 82-4401PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAFEEDIE, District Judge:
Appellant, a former Deputy County Counsel for the County of Sonoma (the “County”), brought this action against the County and the County Retirement Board (the “Board”) seeking additional retirement benefits pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1336. 1 The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment and the district court granted appellees’ motion, finding that appellant’s claim for additional retirement benefits was barred by his failure to timely file a proper request therefor. We find no material facts are in dispute and that the district court properly concluded that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- William Radobenko and Mary G. Radobenko, His Wife, Individually and as Husband and Wife v. Automated Equipment Corporation, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Santiago v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Jackson v. AxtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Baccei v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Sierra Club v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- City of Philadelphia v. SessionsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Long v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.