Legal Opinion

Gene Southerland v. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union, Local 8, Defendant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 27, 1988No. 85-4428PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEGGE, District Judge:

FACTS

Plaintiff and appellee Gene Southerland sued the defendant and appellant union under the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 411 and 412. Plaintiff sought compensatory and punitive damages for lost wages, alleging that the union had violated his due process rights in suspending him for a disciplinary violation.

The district court found that the union had violated plaintiffs due process rights, but held that plaintiff had failed to establish any compensable injury. The district court therefore granted a directed verdict and entered…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. University of Nevada v. TarkanianNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Murray v. Laborers Union Local No. 324Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States ex rel. Reed v. CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States for Use and Benefit of Dennie Reed, Dba Dennie Reed & Sons, Inc. v. C.E. Callahan, Dba C.E. Callahan Co., Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellee v. Esto, Inc., Formerly Known as H.A. Ekelin & Assoc. United Pacific Insurance Company Reliance Insurance Co., Defendants-Cross-Claimants-Appellants. United States for Use and Benefit of Dennie Reed, Dba Dennie Reed & Sons, Inc. v. C.E. Callahan, Dba C.E. Callahan Co., Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant v. Esto, Inc., Formerly Known as H.A. Ekelin & Assoc. United Pacific Insurance Company Reliance Insurance Co., Defendants-Cross-Claimants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc. v. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API