Exxon Corporation (Now Known as Exxonmobil Corporation) and Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Defendant-Cross
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Exxon Mobil Corporation and Exxon Chemical Patents (together “Exxon”) appeal the judgment of invalidity of United States Patent No. 5,324,800 (the '800 patent) on the ground of anticipation. 1 Phillips Petroleum Company has filed a conditional cross appeal on the issue of interference estoppel. We reverse the judgment of invalidity, affirm the ruling on the cross appeal, and remand for further proceedings.
I
In response to Exxon’s suit for infringement of the '800 patent, Phillips asserted, inter alia, the defense of patent invalidity based on anticipation by a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Federal Communications Commission v. SchreiberSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Baxter International, Inc., and Baxter Healthcare Corporation v. McGaw Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Gilbert P. Hyatt v. Gary W. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Urologix, Inc. v. PROSTALUND ABDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2002