Legal Opinion

In Re Bertrand

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 27, 1943No. Crim. 1844PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.

On April 27, 1938, an information was filed in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco charging petitioner herein with a violation of section 1, chapter 339, of the Statutes of 1923, in that on or about April 11, 1938, he did, in said city and county of San Francisco, “wilfully, unlawfully, knowingly and feloniously possess an instrument and weapon of the kind commonly known and designated as a blackjack.” Said information also alleged that on or about July 18, 1920, the said Edward Bertrand had been “received at San Quentin Penitentiary, having been convicted in the County…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. In Re BoatwrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. People v. SamaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. People v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. People v. VaileCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re TartarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. In Re SandelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. In Re SeeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. In Re GilliamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. In Re ValenzuelaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API