Legal Opinion

People v. Murray

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 31, 1940No. Crim. 2135PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

The appellant, Frank Murray, was found guilty by a jury on two informations charging him with the crime of receiving stolen goods, and with five prior convictions of felony. The stolen goods consisted of two portable typewriters which he sold for $10 each. The prior convictions were admitted. The first was for robbery (a federal offense); the second was for burglary under the state law; the third was apparently for some federal offense not specified in the accusation; and the fourth and fifth were for violations of the narcotic laws, one federal and the other state. The infor mátións were…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. DawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. In Re BoatwrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. People v. TilleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. People v. CarkeekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. People v. StennettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re TartarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. State v. O'DELLIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  5. People v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API