Legal Opinion
Ponderosa Homes, Inc. v. City of San Ramon
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 8, 1994No. A060955PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MERRILL, J.
Ponderosa Homes, Inc. (Ponderosa), appeals from a judgment in favor of respondents, the City of San Ramon (the City) and the San Ramon City Council (the City Council), entered upon the granting of respondents’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. The issues raised on the motion and on this appeal are the date upon which the applicable statute of limitations commenced running, and which statute of limitations is applicable to each cause of action. Ponderosa contends that no statute of limitations had run, and therefore the trial court erred in granting the motion for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- William St. Clair John Shelton v. City of Chico County of ButteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Norco Construction, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. King County, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Baillargeon v. Dep't of Water & Power of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of La HabraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- California Cannabis Coalition v. City of UplandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Ruttenberg v. RuttenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Western/California, Ltd. v. Dry Creek Joint Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Gonzalez v. County of TulareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.