Legal Opinion

La Maur, Inc. v. DeMert & Dougherty, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 23, 1965No. 62 C 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MAROVITZ, District Judge.

After extensive review of the cumbersome briefs and records herein, I have concluded, as did the Eighth Circuit, that the Spiegel Patent is invalid. I am unable to accept plaintiff’s major theory that the functions of setting lotions and hair sprays are so divergent as to make plaintiff’s “invention” a sufficient advance over the prior art as developed in the Janistyn reference. That is, Janistyn’s water-PVP combination appears to leave an identical water-soluble film on a subject’s hair, and should not, via plaintiff’s semantic tricks, be…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Dow Chemical Co. v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Muncie Gear Works, Inc. v. Outboard, Marine & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
  2. Application of Henri-Georges DollCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  3. Arthur J. Schmitt Foundation v. Stockham Valves & Fittings, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1966
  4. Leach v. Rockwood & CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API