Legal Opinion
Application of Henri-Georges Doll
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 8, 1970No. Patent Appeal 8223PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming' the examiner’s rejection of claims 32-35, 42 and 43 in appellant’s application for a reissue patent 1 on the grounds that the claims are barred By the fourth paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 251 and not supported by an oath complying with Patent Office Rule 175.
The invention relates to method and apparatus for oil well logging, with which information about the nature of earth formations surrounding a borehole is obtained. More important than an understanding of the invention here is the history of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- La Maur, Inc. v. DeMert & Dougherty, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1965
- Jacques Andre Stohr v. Edward J. Brenner, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Richard N. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- In Re Paul GraffCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- In Re Richard A. Fotland and Jeffrey J. CarrishCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- In re WittryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- In Re StaatsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.