Legal Opinion

Mowat v. Walsh

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1926No. Docket No. 35PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiff was purchaser and defendant vendor in a land contract, dated March 1, 1920, covering 12 lots in Detroit, the unpaid portion of the purchase price being $3,600, “payable on or before July 1, 1922.” Plaintiff did not reduce the principal debt. On June 30,1922, he wrote to defendant saying, “Can’t you extend it (time of payment) another year or six months?” On July 3, 1922, defendant replied:

“With reference to your request for an extension of the principal, I regret to say that I will be unable to grant it but I will give you the rest of this month to make provisions for the payment.”

Pl…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rathbone v. GrohMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Oakman v. EsperMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Derosia v. AustinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. MacGlashan v. HarperMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Czeizler v. RadkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Laker v. SoverinskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Brear v. BaumgartnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API