Legal Opinion

Laker v. Soverinsky

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1947No. Docket No. 60, Calendar No. 43,627PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtttzel, J.

James and Marvin Laker on'the 11th day of January, 1946, entered into a lease with defendant Soverinsky for rental of a space approximately 18 feet square in a building in Detroit, Michigan, for the purpose of conducting a wiping cloth business in which dirty, unsorted rags are collected and, after being laundered and sorted, are sold to various industrial establishments. Subsequently, Joseph Graba entered the Laker firm as a partner and with defendant’s consent became an additional lessee. The three partners are the plaintiffs herein. The lease was for a period of one year from February…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Waller v. LiebermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. MacGlashan v. HarperMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Mowat v. WalshMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Smith v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Keys v. HopperMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. WingetCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Mayor's Jewellers v. Calif. PersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. 8600 Associates, Ltd. Partnership v. Wearguard Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1990
  4. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. v. LL & 127, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  5. Barbers Local 552 v. SealyMichigan Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API