Legal Opinion

Rathbone v. Groh

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1904No. Docket No. 41PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Donovan, J. Bill by William S. Rathbone and Alfred Graham against Albert A. Groh, Lillian C. Groh, Chase Aldona, and Tilly Aldona, impleaded with Sophia M. B. Slocum and John H. Smedley, to enforce the specific performance of a land contract. From a decree for complainants, defendants Groh and Aldona appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Defendants Albert A', and Lillian O. Groh are husband and wife. On December 11, 1893, Louis Groh conveyed to his son, said Albert A. Groh, the lands in controversy, but the wife of said Louis Groh, then and now living, did not sign the deed. The lands were also-incumbered by a mortgage to one Slocum for $1,000. These lands adjoined lands owned by Rathbone and Ella Graham, the complainants, and the boundary was in dispute. Negotiations were had with a view to settling the same, in the course of which there was talk of a purchase of the land in controversy by the complainants Rathbone and Ella…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rust v. ConradMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Chambers v. LivermoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Munch v. ShabelMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Chapman v. MorganMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Pingle v. ConnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mowat v. WalshMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Hedrick v. FirkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Harmon v. MuirheadMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. McGregor v. Farmers State Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Gibb v. MintlineMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API