Legal Opinion

MacGlashan v. Harper

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1941No. Docket No. 14, Calendar No. 41,593PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiff, William F. MacGlashan, a resident of the State of California, by his attorney and agent, filed a bill of complaint against defendants Harper, Haller and Richards, copartners doing business as Tecumseh Gravel Company, for the reformation of the description in a certain lease, accounting of the amount due and owing by plaintiff, and specific performance of an agreement contained therein to convey lands.

In the record and the exhibits, plaintiff is described as an individual, as “W. F. MacGlashan Associates,” and as‘“W. F. MacGlashan Industries.” The answer avers that Tecumseh Gravel…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Waller v. LiebermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Mowat v. WalshMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Brear v. BaumgartnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Smith v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Richards v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gurunian v. GrossmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Friedman v. WinshallMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Derosia v. AustinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Czeizler v. RadkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Higbie v. ChaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API