Legal Opinion

Brear v. Baumgartner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1930No. Docket No. 29, Calendar No. 33,879PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

In these combined suits for specific performance of land contracts, the relief sought was denied on the ground that Mr. William H, Brear, who was found to be the real party plaintiff in interest in both suits, was guilty of unconscionable, if not fraudulent, conduct in making these contracts. From a decree dismissing both cases, the plaintiffs have appealed.

Mr. William H. Brear and his wife, together with one Heenan, constituted the Bell Realty Company, a Michigan corporation. There were 100 shares of stock in this corporation. Mrs. Brear held 98 shares, and Mr. Brear and Mr. Heenan, an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Waller v. LiebermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Mowat v. WalshMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. MacGlashan v. HarperMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Czeizler v. RadkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Higbie v. ChaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Grade v. LoafmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Worsham v. McCallMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API