Russo v. Hochschild Kohn & Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
January Term, 1945.]
1Opinion of the CourtGrason, J.
Appellant sued appellee in the Court of Common Pleas of Baltimore City, in assumpsit, for alleged special damages directly resulting to her from a breach of warranty of fitness of certain hair lacquer pads sold by appellee to appellant. The second plea of appellee to the declaration is as follows: “That the Plaintiff, on or about September 30, 1943, with full knowledge of the alleged breach of warranty, and the resulting damage, returned the unused hair lacquer pads complained of to the Defendant and accepted credit on her account with the Defendant for $1.10, the full purchase price.” To…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boulden v. StilwellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
- Keiner v. Commerce Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Impervious Products Co. v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
- Reynolds v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gross v. Sussex Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Abdallah, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Jones v. Fenton Ford, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
- Addressograph-Multigraph Corp. v. ZinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Garbark v. NewmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.