Legal Opinion

Addressograph-Multigraph Corp. v. Zink

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 2, 1975No. [No. 66, September Term. 1974.]PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSingley, J.

In February, 1970, George Zink, trading as Peacock Printing Company, leased from C.I.T. Leasing Corporation (C.I.T.) a VariTyper, a Headliner and a Waxer, all manufactured by VariTyper Corporation, then a subsidiary, and now a division, of Addressograph-Multigraph Corporation (Addressograph). The equipment, purchased at an unspecified date from Addressograph by C.I.T., had been delivered to Zink’s printing plant in late December, 1969, where it had been serviced by Addressograph.

Zink’s lease with C.I.T., which was for a term of five years, called for an advance payment of five monthly…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. St. Paul at Chase Corp. v. Manufacturers Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Insurance v. MessengerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  4. United States Telegraph Co. v. GildersleveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  5. Empire Realty Co. v. FleisherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Impala Platinum Ltd. v. Impala Sales (U.S.A.), Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Phipps v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Tucker v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
  4. Copiers Typewriters Calculators, Inc. v. Toshiba Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1983
  5. Lovell Land, Inc. v. State Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API