Impervious Products Co. v. Gray
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. (Sober, C. J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtStockbridge, J.
In the year 1911, H. Emory Gray entered into a contract with the State Roads Commission for the construction of a road on Patapsco street, between Eirst street and Pennington avenue, Brooklyn, Anne Arundel County. For the execution of that contract Mr. Gray, among other materials, had occasion to purchase a preparation known as binder, and in the month of September agreed with the Impervious Products Company for the supply of it, which he would need in the construction of the road under his contarct. The terms of that agreement were as follows:
“September —, 1911.
“H. E. Gray, Esq.,
“Brooklyn,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Whitehurst v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
- Beall v. PearreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
- Trayhern v. ColburnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
- Brooke v. Gregg Ex Rel. GreggCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
- Eureka Fertilizer Co. v. Baltimore CopperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Beka Industries, Inc. v. Worcester County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Hamlin MacHine Co. v. Holtite Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Parker v. Tilghman v. Morgan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- H. J. McGrath Co. v. WisnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- District Agency Co. v. Suburban Delivery Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.