Legal Opinion

New York Life Insurance v. Viglas

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 30, 1936No. 602PublishedCited by 146 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cardozo

delivered the! opinion of the Court.

The case, which is here upon demurrer to a declaration, depends for its solution upon the nature of the breach of contract imputed to the defendant, the petitioner in .this court, and upon the measure of the damages recoverable therefor.

From the declaration we learn the following: Respondent received from petitioner on February 7, 1927, a policy of insurance for $2,000 payable at his death. The consideration was a semiannual premium of $38 payable during his life, but for not more than twenty years.. If, however, the insured became totally and permanently…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Norrington v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Dingley v. OlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. McCready v. . LindenbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1902

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by146 opinions

  1. Clarence Eisen v. Oliver C. EastmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  2. Brownell Combs, Ii, Administrator C.T.A. Of the Estate of Leslie Combs, Ii, Deceased v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. Rabouin v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  5. Smyth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API