Legal Opinion

Trull v. Carolina-Virginia Well Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 18, 1965No. 700PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoobe, J.

This is a civil action instituted 9 July 1963 by plaintiffs to recover damages for injury to their dwelling allegedly caused by the negligence of defendant in well-drilling operations on their premises.

Plaintiffs’ evidence tends to establish these facts: Plaintiffs’ residence is located at 3811 Lawndale Drive, Greensboro. The exterior walls of the house are of “Mt. Airy Granite,” the basement walls are cinder block and stone, and the foundation and footings are reinforced concrete. Plaintiffs employed defendant to drill a well for the purpose of supplying water for the house. Mr. Smith, agent…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Springs v. . DollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Exner v. Sherman Power Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. Guilford Realty & Insurance Co. v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Caporale v. C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  5. Jackson v. NEILL McKAY GIN COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Chicago Flood LitigationIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Pullen v. WestSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. Cockerham v. WardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Berry v v. Greater Park City Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Ingold v. Carolina Power & Light CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API