Legal Opinion

Criterion Interests, Inc. v. Deschutes Club

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 18, 1995No. CC90-92; CA A81541PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Defendant moves for reconsideration of our opinion. 136 Or App 239, 902 P2d 110 (1995). Among its arguments is that our statement that “[defendant does not assert that the deed is not an integrated writing,” id. at 245 n 4, is factually inaccurate. The statement does not precisely capture our intended meaning. We correct it to read: “Defendant makes no argument that the deed is not an integrated writing, except an implicit argument that depends for its success on the correctness of other arguments that defendant makes.”

We have considered and reject the other contentions in the motion.

Reconside…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Criterion Interests, Inc. v. Deschutes ClubCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Batzer Construction, Inc. v. John BoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. City of Eugene v. MonacoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Oregon Trail Electric Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Co-Gen Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Anderson v. DivitoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Murray v. LaugsandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API