Legal Opinion
City of Eugene v. Monaco
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 27, 2000No. 16-98-03917; CA A105054PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
Plaintiff City of Eugene filed this action against defendant Joseph Monaco for breaching a lease. Monaco counterclaimed for breach of the lease and for breach of the duty of good faith. Monaco appeals from a judgment in the city’s favor. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
The city leased a building to Monaco 2 in 1993. Monaco used the building to operate a discount furniture business. In 1994, the parties executed a one-year written lease setting Monaco’s rent at $3,120 per month. The written lease expired on June 30, 1995. On July 26, 1995, the city sent Monaco a letter stating…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Abercrombie v. Hayden Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Buck v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Zehr v. HaugenOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Barbre v. GoodaleOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Baker v. EnglishOregon Supreme Court · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Batzer Construction, Inc. v. John BoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Benjamin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Pierre Arboireau and Sandrine Arboireau v. Adidas-Salomon Ag, a Foreign Corporation and Adidas America, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Ferguson v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Rubicon Global Ventures, Inc. v. Chongqing Zongshen Group Import/Export Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2016
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.