Anderson v. Divito

Plaintiff brought an action for declaratory judgment to interpret the terms of a contract. The trial court entered judgment for plaintiff, after ruling that one of defendant’s options to purchase plaintiffs interest in real property had expired. Defendant submits nine assignments of error related to that ruling. Plaintiff cross-appeals the trial court’s denial of his request for prejudgment interest. We affirm on the appeal and the cross-appeal.

Plaintiff and defendant went into business together in 1983 as equal owners of the corporate stock in an automobile dealership in Gresham. They…