Legal Opinion
Shain v. Armour & Co.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided August 28, 1941No. 256PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, District Judge.
This action was brought by the plaintiff Alfred C. Shain on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated against the defendant Armo'ur and Company under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201 through 219. Recovery is sought for overtime wages alleged to be due under Section 7(a) of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 207(a). The defendant has moved to strike from the complaint as amended all allegations and references to other employees “similarly situated”, contending that the statute does not authorize such a class suit under the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Society Milion Athena, Inc. v. National Bank of GreeceNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Batman v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Saxton v. W. S. Askew Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1940
- Garfein v. StiglitzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Pentland v. Dravo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Swigart v. Fifth Third BankDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Sheffield v. Orius Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2002
- Gordon v. Paducah Ice Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
- Lofther v. First Nat. Bank of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1941
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.