Legal Opinion

Rubin v. Midlinsky

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1926No. 17114. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Appellant filed a bill against appellees, Samuel and Anna Midlinsky, seeking an accounting and redemption of certain real estate in the city of Chicago. Appellees answered, and Anna Midlinsky filed a cross-bill seeking to remove certain deeds and affidavits as clouds on the real estate and for an injunction restraining further acts of interference with her rights as owner of the real estate.

It is alleged in appellant’s bill that in May, 1915, he was indebted to Samuel Midlinsky in the sum of $1900, and that he gave the latter his notes, signed by himself and his wife, amounting to $4500,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Higgins v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Rankin v. RankinIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Winkelman v. WinkelmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Niland v. KennedyIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Streeter v. GambleIllinois Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bremer v. BremerIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Tucker v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Maley v. BurnsIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Kausky v. KostenWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Carpenter & Carpenter, Inc. v. KinghamWyoming Supreme Court · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API