Legal Opinion
State v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 16, 1997No. C4-97-267PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
After Louis Williams failed to make two scheduled court appearances, the trial court ordered forfeiture of the bail bond securing his appearance. The surety, Interstate Bonding, Inc. (Interstate), appeals the trial court’s order denying its motions to: (1) reinstate and discharge the bond; and (2) rescind the 30-day suspension automatically imposed on Interstate for failure to pay the forfeited bond.
FACTS
On September 2, 1996, Interstate posted a $2,000 bail bond to guarantee the appearance of Louis Williams to face charges of motor vehicle theft and other offenses in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- In re ShetskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Nguyen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Stoebe v. Merastar Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Hopkins Ex Rel. LaFontaine v. Empire Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. VangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. RosilloCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- State of Minnesota v. Alberto Villa-Barrera, Ability Bonding Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Jose C. Garcia Delaharran, Griffin Bail Bonds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009