Legal Opinion

Shah v. Howard Johnson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 2000No. COA99-964PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Judge.

The law governing appellate review of Industrial Commission decisions is well settled in this state. Review “is limited to a determination of (1) whether the findings of fact are supported by competent evidence, and (2) whether the conclusions of law are supported by the findings.” Barham v. Food World, 300 N.C. 329, 331, 266 S.E.2d 676, 678, reh’g denied, 300 N.C. 562, 270 S.E.2d 105 (1980). Furthermore, so long as there is some “evidence of substance which directly or by reasonable inference tends to support the findings, this Court is bound by such evidence, even though there…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Peoples v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Barham v. Food World, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Burwell v. Winn-Dixie Raleigh, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Robbins v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Tim Neal v. Annett Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  2. Chavis v. TLC Home Health CareCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Shockley v. Cairn Studios Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Rose v. City of Rocky MountCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Bailey v. Western Staff ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API