Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Magee

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1915No. Sac. No. 2052Published

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. T. T. C. Gregory, Theodore W. Chester, and C. J. Goodell, for Appellants

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Plaintiffs sued as successors of Michael Magee, deceased, seeking a judgment that James Ma.gee, Jr., and Michael Magee were partners in business at the time of the latter’s death; that plaintiffs were entitled to half of the earnings of the partnership since the demise of said-Michael; and for an accounting. The court found the existence of the partnership as alleged and that defendant had taken into his possession $7,293 belonging to said partnership, all of which he had appropriated to his own use except seventy-five dollars. It was also found that plaintiffs owned a half interest in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Type Founders' Co. v. PackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Di Nola v. AllisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Gwin v. CalegarisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Drathman v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Standard Quicksilver Co. v. HabishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API