Legal Opinion
Roc, Inc. v. Progress Drillers, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided January 29, 1979No. CIV-78-0968-DPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action to recover unpaid rentals under a written contract for the lease of a drilling rig. The Complaint alleges that Plaintiff is a Kansas corporation with its principal place of business in Kansas. Defendant is alleged to be a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Texas. It is asserted that the Court has jurisdiction of this action by reason of diversity of citizenship and amount in controversy pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
Defendant has filed herein a Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer to the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- William B. Scheidt and Wanda C. Scheidt v. William Randolph KleinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Van Howell v. Joe D. Tanner, Individually and as Commissioner of Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Terra International, Inc. v. Mississippi Chemical Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
- Van Gelder v. TaylorDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Southern Investors II v. Commuter Aircraft Corp.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.