Legal Opinion
Southern Investors II v. Commuter Aircraft Corp.
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided August 18, 1981No. Civ.A.81-364-BPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POLOZOLA,-District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Southern Investors II (Southern) and Southern Investors Management Company, Inc. (SIMCO), have filed this diversity action seeking damages for breach of contract by the defendant, Commuter Aircraft Corporation, (CAC). Southern is a Louisiana partnership while SIMCO is a Louisiana corporation. Defendant, CAC, is a Maryland corporation having its principal place of business in Ohio but also does business in California. Plaintiffs claim that CAC requested Paine, Webber, Jackson and Curtis, an investment banking group for CAC, to seek a lender for a working…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Enplanar, Inc. v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Searcy v. KnostmanDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1993
- AMERICAN BK. & TRUST CO. v. Sunbelt EnvironmentalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- J. Wilton Jones Co. v. Touche Ross & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
- Icon Industrial Controls Corp. v. Cimetrix, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.