Legal Opinion

Dickinson v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1916No. L. A. No. 3589. Department OnePublishedCited by 31 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Action to recover damages for the alleged negligent killing of plaintiff's intestate. The defendants are railway corporations, the one owning and the other operating under lease a line of steam railway running through the city of Bakersfield. A train of said line ran into a buggy which the decedent, Samuel Dickinson, was driving, and Dickinson was instantly killed.

Judgment went in favor of the plaintiff for $10,230. From this judgment, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial, the defendants appeal.

There is no room to doubt that the evidence warranted the jury in finding that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Munro v. Pacific Coast Dredging & Reclamation Co.California Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hale v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Beeson v. Green Mountain Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Krouse v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Buckley v. ChadwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Canavin v. Pacific Southwest AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Lydia Williams v. Delano DowlingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API