Aldridge v. Foil Motor Company
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtShaRp, J.
In Burnett v. Paint Co., 216 N.C. 204, 4 S.E. 2d 507, 172 A.L.R. 378, it was held that if an employee of a business coming within the purview of the Workmen’s Compensation Act is injured while performing work for the private and personal benefit of his employer, which work is unrelated in character or location to the business of the employer, he is not entitled to compensation under the Act. In that case, Mrs. Lipe, the employer, was the sole proprietor of a paint and decoration shop at 82 Patton Avenue in Asheville where Burnett worked as janitor and delivery boy. His salary, paid entirely…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Biddix v. Rex Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Burnett v. Palmer-Lipe Paint Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Ammons v. Z. A. Sneeden's Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Smith Coal Co. v. FeltnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
- Pitman v. L. M. Carpenter & AssociatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Godley v. County of PittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Carroll v. Daniels & Daniels Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Britt v. Colony Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Stewart v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Doud v. K & G JANITORIAL SERVICESCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.