Legal Opinion

Estate of Goetz

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 20, 1910No. Civ. No. 771PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, denying a petition for partial distribution. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying petitions for partial distribution of the above-named estate. Joseph Goetz by his last will, executed May 11, 1904, bequeathed to his nephew Jules Lesage the sum of $30,000. Toward the end of that year Jules Lesage died. Three years later the testator died. The appellants are children of Jules Lesage and the respondents are the executors of the will and certain beneficiaries thereunder.

The provisions of the will involved in this appeal read as follows:

“Third: I give and*bequeath to Jules Lesage my nephew who resides in the city of Mulhausen Alsace…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Mitchell v. DonohueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. In re the Estate of WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Smith v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Logan v. LoganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate of CarrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Heard v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. In Re Estate of SowashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Estate of BlalockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Lincoln County Bank v. FettermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API