Legal Opinion

Smith v. Morgan

California Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1896No. S. F. No. 279PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County. J. H. Logan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The administrator with the will annexed of the above estate presented to the superior court a petition for the distribution of the estate, alleging therein that the residue thereof was bequeathed by the decedent to her husband, Thomas Stratton. This distribution was contested by the respondent herein, and, upon the hearing of the application, the court distributed the residue in the hands of the administrator to him. We are of the opinion, however, that upon a proper construction of the will, the testatrix intended that her husband should be the residuary legatee of her estate.

The will is an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lane v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Mitchell v. DonohueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. In Re the Estate of ManchesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Spaniard v. TantomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Estate of MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API