Legal Opinion

Mabe v. State Ex Rel. Rich

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1963No. 9204PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

In the prior opinion in this action, Mabe v. State, 83 Idaho 222, 228, 360 P.2d 799, 802, the District Court entered its order granting respondent’s motion for summary-judgment against appellants Mabe and wife, which order was reversed by this court and the cause remanded with the following statement:

“ * * * Should further proceedings show that there had been such a substantial impairment of appellants’ right of access as alleged, as contrasted to a mere matter of inconvenience or circuity of route, as contended by respondent, then appellants must be compensated for such…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Illinois Power & Light Corp. v. TalbottIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Mabe v. State Ex Rel. RichIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  4. City of Chicago v. SpoorIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Blumenstein v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Mann v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Barlow v. International Harvester CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Deshazer v. TompkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Bratton v. SliningerIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Holland v. PetersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API