Legal Opinion

Mabe v. State Ex Rel. Rich

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1961No. 8881PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcFADDEN, Justice

Appellants by this action seek damages for impairment to and taking of highway access to their real property, being purchased under an agreement of sale. Respondents’ motion for summary judgment was granted and judgment entered dismissing the action with prejudice.

Appellants assign as error the court’s action in granting the motion and entering summary judgment; they claim that the amended complaint and affidavit of appellant Orville O. Mabe, set forth facts showing material interference with and damage to their right of access to U. S. Highway 30, with resulting depreciation to their…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. United States v. GrizzardSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. State v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Continental Oil Co. v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Diehl v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Grant Construction Co. v. BurnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Dawson Enterprises, Inc. v. Blaine CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. DanfelserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Johnston v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1964

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API