Legal Opinion
United States v. Arlie D. Maggard, United States of America v. Daisy Dawn Maggard, United States of America v. Timothy J. Maggard
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 26, 1998No. 97-2482, 97-2483 and 97-3180PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLOYD R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.
In these direct criminal appeals, Arlie D. Maggard, Daisy Dawn Maggard, and Timothy J. Maggard, (collectively “the appellants”) challenge their convictions and sentences, claiming the district court 1 committed the following errors. Arlie and Daisy each challenge the sufficiency of -the evidence against them and various sentencing issues. 2 Tim Maggard challenges the admission of evidence of prior offenses; the court’s refusal to offer an addict instruction, and several sentencing issues. 3 For the reasons set forth below, we 'affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Arlie, Daisy…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. Timothy Paul Parker, United States of America v. William August ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Thomas Ervin Payne, United States of America v. Christopher FosterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Ricky Lee HascallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Herbert Lee BassCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Jim Guy TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- United States v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Spotted ElkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. David Joseph MickelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. James F. AtkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Duane Carl CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.