Legal Opinion
Stout v. AMCO Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 13, 2002No. CX-01-246PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANCASTER, Justice.
Jason Stout sustained injuries to his knees when a car insured by AMCO Insurance Company hit him. Stout was billed $25,638.73 by medical service providers for the treatment of his injuries. The amount billed was discounted pursuant to Medicaid and MinnesotaCare fee schedules, leaving a balance of $12,471.44. The parties agree that, under the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 65B.41-.71 (2000), AMCO must reimburse Stout’s loss. The sole issue on appeal is whether Stout’s loss is equal to the amount originally billed or the post-discount…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Meister v. Western National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Burkstrand v. BurkstrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Swanson v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie FossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Do v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Foust v. McFairlandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Stand Up Multipositional Advantage MRI, P.A. v. American Family Insurance Company, a Wisconsin corporation, Michael Schultz, Ilya Knyazev, Thomas Bennerotte, Jed Benjamin Iverson, Gabriel Johnson, Michael Fay, Brad Ratgen, Landon Barakow, Lebertha PorterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.