Legal Opinion
Triangle, Inc. v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided September 4, 1981No. 4811PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
This is an appeal from an eminent domain action. The principal issue raised is whether a lessee of real property is entitled to compensation for the state’s elimination of direct access from the property to an abutting highway. Other issues raised on appeal include the proper measure of compensation for a lessee whose property is partially condemned when the lessee holds options to renew its lease, and the proper measure for attorney’s fees, costs and prejudgment interest in eminent domain actions.
As part of a project to widen and upgrade the Steese Highway in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. BackusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Stefan Auto Body v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Wernberg v. Matanuska Electric AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. DanfelserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- La Plata Elec. Ass'n, Inc. v. CumminsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- City of Valdez v. 18.99 Acres, More or Less, of Land Situated in the City of ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Joseph M. Jackovich Revocable Trust v. State, Department of TransportationAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Schliem v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Resource Investments v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.