Legal Opinion
Joseph M. Jackovich Revocable Trust v. State, Department of Transportation
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided September 6, 2002No. S-9686PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Owners of improved real properties asserted inverse condemnation claims against the State of Alaska, complaining that information the state published about its intentions to acquire land needed for a projected road project deprived them of the full use and enjoyment of their properties, reduced the value of their properties, and constituted de facto takings. The superior court dismissed their claims on summary judgment. We affirm. Taking all permissible factual inferences in favor of the landowners, we conclude that the state did not publicly announce a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kiriakides v. SCH. DIST. OF GREENVILLESupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Spinell Homes, Inc. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- AVCG, LLC v. State of Alaska, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
- City of Colorado Springs v. Andersen Mahon Enterprises, LLPColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- City of Albuquerque v. SMP Props., LLCNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.