Legal Opinion

Neal v. Hamilton County

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1993No. C-920140PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff-appellant, Carolyn A Neal, appeals from the directed verdict entered by the trial court in favor of defendants-appellees on her claims for constructive discharge and handicap discrimination by her employer and her employer’s agent and representatives. In her seven assignments of error, five of which involve the trial court’s entry of directed verdict, Neal contends: (1) the trial court erred in directing a verdict because the trial court, contrary to law, considered weight and credibility and construed inferences; (2) a directed verdict on her handicap- discrimination-based claims…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Plumbers & Steamfitters Joint Apprenticeship Committee v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Paugh v. HanksOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Ruta v. Breckenridge-Remy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Baker v. the Buschman CompanyOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Zimmerman v. Eagle Mortgage Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Delaney v. Skyline Lodge, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Wille v. Hunkar Laboratories, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API