Legal Opinion

Wille v. Hunkar Laboratories, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1998No. C-971107PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hildebrandt, Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION AND FACTS

In this case we must decide whether the lower court properly granted summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees, Hunkar Laboratories, Inc. (“HLI”) and its president, Denes Hunkar, on the complaint filed by plaintiff-appellant, Christy Wille. Wille, a former employee of HLI, brought suit against HLI and Hunkar asserting claims of sexual harassment in violation of state and federal law, the common-law tort of sexual harassment, unlawful retaliation under state and federal law, and constructive discharge. After reviewing the entire record, we…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Procter Gamble Company v. StonehamOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Peterson v. Buckeye Steel CasingsOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Berge v. Columbus Community Cable AccessOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Reddy v. Good Samaritan Hospital & Health CenterDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
  5. Charles v. Interior Regional Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API