Legal Opinion
In Re Urethane Antitrust Litigation
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided August 14, 2009No. Case Nos. 04-1616-JWL, 08-2617-JWL, 09-2026-JWL. MDL No. 1616PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
663 F.Supp.2d 1067 (2009)
In re URETHANE ANTITRUST LITIGATION,
This Document Relates to the Direct Action Polyether Polyol Cases:
Carpenter Co., et al.
v.
BASF SE, et al., and
Woodbridge Foam Corporation, et al.
v.
BASF SE, et al.
Case Nos. 04-1616-JWL, 08-2617-JWL, 09-2026-JWL. MDL No. 1616.
United States District Court, D. Kansas.
August 14, 2009.
George A. Hanson, Norman E. Siegel, Stueve Siegel Hanson LLP, W. Joseph Hatley, Spencer Fane Britt & Browne LLP, Kansas City, MO, Rex A. Sharp, Gunderson Sharp & Walke, LLP, Prairie Village, KS, Roy Morrow Bell, Troutman Sanders LLP, San Diego, CA, Steven A.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Stevens v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
- In re EpipenDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- Soward v. Deutsche Bank AgDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Centaur Classic Convertible Arbitrage Fund Ltd. v. Countrywide Financial Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Seaboard Corp. v. Marsh Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.