Legal Opinion

Shadybrook Environmental Protection Ass'n v. Washington County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 2, 1983No. 81-023, CA A22835PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Petitioners seek review of a Land Use Board of Appeals’ (LUBA) final opinion and order permitting operation of a quarry — a nonforest use — under Statewide Planning Goal 4' if, after remand and further consideration by the county, a finding is made that forest lands will be retained and protected for existing and potential uses despite the nonforest use allowed. Petitioners argue that LUBA erred in determining that a quarry may be permitted on forest lands without taking an exception to Goal 4 as provided for in Goal 2, Part II. Respondents cross-appeal and assert that LUBA’s opinion and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Bentley v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Flury v. Land Use Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Still v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS OF MARION CTY.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Conklin v. Karban Rock, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Publishers Paper Co. v. Benton CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API