Legal Opinion

Geiger v. Carey

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 31, 2017No. AC38080 AppendixPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs, Gordon Geiger and Elizabeth Geiger, brought this action against the defendant, Francis Carey, their next door neighbor, seeking money damages, punitive damages, and an order requiring the defendant to remove a fence. The complaint sounded in three counts: (1) trespass; (2) violation of Connecticut's tree cutting statute, pursuant to General Statutes § 52-560 ; and (3) malicious erection of a structure, pursuant to General Statutes § 52-570. The defendant brought a counterclaim against the plaintiffs seeking injunctive relief, monetary damages, punitive damages, and an order of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Appleton v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Carrol v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  3. Rivera v. Double A Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. Pestey v. CushmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  5. Craig v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Samakaab v. Dept. of Social ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  2. Arpin v. SempleDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
  3. Jones v. Acuren Inspection, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
  4. Morgan v. SempleDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
  5. Morgan v. SempleDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API