Legal Opinion

Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Armendariz

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 7, 1964No. Civ. 7151PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.

Plaintiff-appellant Ohio Casualty Insurance Company filed this action seeking declaratory relief against defendant Henry J. Martinez and defendant-respond ent Manuel Armendariz, alleging that Martinez received a policy of automobile insurance issued by plaintiff; that said policy of automobile insurance contained a “non-owner” endorsement thereon limiting coverage; that on May 23, 1960, Martinez, while driving a certain truck, was involved in a collision with defendant Armendariz who, as a result of said collision, filed a personal injury action in Orange County against Martinez and others.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Matsuo Yoshida and Chisato Yoshida v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  4. Stoddart v. PeirceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. McConnell v. Underwriters at LloydsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. Consolidated FreightwaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HaightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Phelps v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Allstate Insurance Co. v. ChinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Burke Concrete Accessories, Inc. v. TolsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API