Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Haight
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 30, 1988No. D005978PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STANIFORTH, J.*
Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) filed a complaint for declaratory relief against Johnson-Kinsey, Inc., Edward Allen Wenz, Jr., Mary L. Johnson, James Johnson, Paul Kinsey, Blake Bowen and Dorothy G. Haight (Haight), claiming the driver exclusion endorsement agreement in the State Farm automobile policy excluded Edward Allen Wenz, Jr. from protection under the policy. State Farm disputed Wenz’s entitlement to a defense and indemnity, Johnson-Kinsey’s entitlement to indemnity, and Bowen’s and Haight’s claim of entitlement for personal…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Busic v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Perez v. Van Groningen & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Carter v. Dept. of Veterans AffairsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Nordquist v. McGraw-Hill Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Mogilefsky v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Singh v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.